[ad_1]

Was this pass dead in the air?

Was this go lifeless within the air?
Picture: Getty Photographs

It’s a bit shy of fifty years because the Raiders obtained knocked out of the playoffs by The Immaculate Reception, a play that wasn’t simply dramatic, however controversial.

Did the ball hit the bottom? Did it hit Jack Tatum, making it a authorized catch for Franco Harris, or did it solely hit Frenchy Fuqua, which might have meant an incompletion underneath the foundations on the time? The solutions to these questions have been a supply of debate for 49 years and one month.

At the moment, the Raiders are out of the playoffs once more, and simply as in December of 1972, there’s a controversial landing that’s an enormous a part of the explanation why.

Joe Burrow’s 10-yard landing go to Tyler Boyd simply after the two-minute warning within the first half did have one little bit of readability: the Bengals quarterback clearly was nonetheless inbounds when he threw the ball. What’s much less clear is what occurred whereas the ball was within the air.

The whistle clearly blew earlier than Boyd caught the ball, and by rule, when there’s a whistle, the play is meant to be lifeless. So, sure, the Raiders do have some beef there.

For those who pause the video on the time the whistle blew, although, it’s additionally clear that Raiders security Tre’von Moehrig was not going to make a play on the ball or do something to cease Boyd from making the catch. Whereas Moehrig positively did let up when the whistle sounded, and the NFL’s assertion that Boyd caught the ball earlier than the whistle is plainly mistaken, it’s onerous to say whether or not his response was to the whistle or to realizing he was overwhelmed by Boyd, who was already into his leap by the point the whistle sounded — the ball already was on the aim line, at the least.

Had the officers dominated the play an incompletion and never a landing, the Bengals, who went on to snap their 31-year playoff victory drought, would have been incensed, and it will be fairly straightforward to say that they had been the victims of Some Bullshit — not essentially the mistaken name, however a mistaken final result for certain. That play was a landing.

The Raiders aren’t mistaken to assume that the way in which the play wound up was Some Bullshit, as a result of as soon as that wayward whistle blew, somebody was gonna get screwed over by the way it wound up. However Las Vegas additionally benefited from Some Bullshit on the sport’s last drive, a roughing-the-passer name in opposition to Khalid Kareem that obtained the Raiders 15 yards nearer to a tying landing.

When you may have first-and-goal on the 9 yard line with 30 seconds left and may’t rating a landing to tie the sport, ending up as a substitute with an interception on fourth down after stupidly clocking the ball on first down, this recreation received’t get a cute nickname or half a century and counting of debate about whether or not the 26-19 Cincinnati final result was proper.

The Bengals received, honest and sq., and now they’ll attempt to keep away from additional replication of the 1972 Steelers, who per week after The Immaculate Reception had been so impressed by that magical second that they misplaced, 21-17, to the Dolphins.



[ad_2]

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *